Search Engines Google

Posted by Zeeshan on September 8, 2010

According to Google, “says founder, that” Google’s algorithms demote their website because they are a direct competitor to our search engine. ” Google and questioned the “quality” of the site founder. “Various experts have more the quality of the site became founder, and New York Law School professor James Grimmelmann concluded:” I will Google be able to classify them wrong. “(The links are from Google). Founder refused to discuss the investigation in Texas. But judging our previous discussions with the company, Google does not properly defend their complaint. And one day after the Google blog posts found a place in the even published. The company has not explicitly refer to the investigation or Texas according to Google, but said that Google has tried in the rule to combat the attention of his arguments, rather than divert it on the head.

Founder fights for what he calls the neutrality of research “, which – roughly speaking – applies the principles of network neutrality to the search engines. [Search neutrality is the proposition that the same principles of transparency and non-discrimination on ISPs to search engines ] said, “Found.” neutrality concerns are particularly pressing for research, where 85% share of Google in the global market so much power in the hands of one company. ”

The Company does not claim that Google to unveil its search algorithms. And there’s nothing to be against the right of Google, its own decision algorithms. In the argument that in some cases, there are services – including Google’s services – which are not subject to the same treatment as the other algorithms. It is said that Google “Universal Search” setup – which some Google services are used by a leading investment on search results pages – promotion of services compared to competitors will benefit, and some other sites on the whitelist that they receive preferential treatment.